Australian Football has recently played host to a racism saga that has attracted huge media attention. One of our Indigenous players was called an ‘ape’ by a young female spectator. She was escorted out of the stadium, and he sat out for the rest of the game. The saga was further complicated some time later when the president of the opposing team made an outrageously stupid comment alluding to it on national radio.
I had only mild interest in this issue until I read this article which makes some incredibly valid points about the offensiveness of the original comment. There is no question that calling someone an ‘ape’ is rude. It shouldn’t have been said. But is it really racist?
Calling a white person an ape isn’t considered racist, but things suddenly change when the person is coloured. Why is that?
According to evolutionary theory, humans came from apes, and it has historically been portrayed that the ‘black man’ is closer in the chain to the ape than the ‘white man.’
Evolutionarily speaking then, calling someone an ape means rudely suggesting that they are less ‘evolved’ than their white counterparts. This crosses a social taboo, but if it’s racist then so is evolution. According to evolutionary roots we are not all equal, but somehow pointing that out in public is an atrocity.
Maybe it’s time to re-evaluate our origins, and realize that claiming evolutionary theory as fact, may have much wider ramifications than what we’re willing to accept.
If you read this post, please read my follow-up post: Apologies, my last Post hadn’t quite evolved enough.
Good call. 😉
Thanks Dan. It was very limited by the 250 words which hasn’t enabled me to cover all my bases, but hopefully if people want more they will go to the link.
Which respectable, modern evolutionary biologist says that caucasians are further along the evolutionary path and black people are closer to apes? Racial heirarchical models of evolution have been disproved looooong ago. Sounds like you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the theory of evolution, which, by the way, is an accepted fact as much as the theory of relativity.
Hi. Thanks for visiting and for your comments. 🙂
Christians being suspicious of evolution: now THERE’S a theory worth questioning! Check out Biologos.
Oh dear Arthur… it’s best for me not to get started on this one. 🙂 Let’s just say I’ll use the Bible to interpret the world, not the world to interpret the bible…
Excellent outlook! BTW, I understand that apes and other primates are outraged at the idea that we’re related to them in any way!
haha if I was them, I probably would be too… they must think we’re total idiots for rejecting the creator!
Sounds good to me, Sarah! But there are at least two issues: how to read the Bible, and what the Bible is for in the first place.
I really don’t think it was meant in a racist way. Have you seen Adam Goodes!? He is VERY hairy – and that’s the way I think it was intended!!!
I think you may be right. Very inappropriate and derogatory, but not racist as much of the hype has suggested.
[…] I found on Sarsrose’s blog. Each relate to neo-racism and are relevant reads. Check them out here and […]